What's new

Welcome to App4Day.com

Join us now to get access to all our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, and so, so much more. It's also quick and totally free, so what are you waiting for?

Can Construction Grammar Be Proven Wrong

F

Frankie

Moderator
Joined
Jul 7, 2023
Messages
102,490
Reaction score
0
Points
36
7df44fcf6573f270a77ee9b5ab7c8763.jpeg

Free Download Can Construction Grammar Be Proven Wrong?
English | 2024 | ISBN: 1009478788 | 82 Pages | PDF (True) | 2 MB
Construction Grammar has gained prominence in linguistics, owing its popularity to its inclusive approach that considers language units of varying sizes and generality as potential constructions - mentally stored form-function units. This Element serves as a cautionary note against complacency and dogmatism. It emphasizes the enduring importance of falsifiability as a criterion for scientific hypotheses and theories. Can every postulated construction, in principle, be empirically demonstrated not to exist? As a case study, the author examines the schematic English transitive verb-particle construction, which defies experimental verification. He argues that we can still reject its non-existence using sound linguistic reasoning. But beyond individual constructions, what could be a crucial test for Construction Grammar itself, one that would falsify it as a theory? In making a proposal for such a test, designed to prove that speakers also exhibit pure-form knowledge, this Element contributes to ongoing discussions about Construction Grammar's theoretical foundations.​


Recommend Download Link Hight Speed | Please Say Thanks Keep Topic Live

Rapidgator
og6w4.zip.html
NitroFlare
og6w4.zip
Uploadgig
og6w4.zip
Fikper
og6w4.zip.html
Links are Interchangeable - Single Extraction
 
Top Bottom